When frivolous opinions buzzed

by Sharique on September 26, 2006

So what’s the fuss all about? Bloggers are castigating Islam as a belligerent religion which has no respect for human rights. They base their claim on human rights violation in many Gulf countries. They argue that Hindus in Gulf, especially Saudi Arabia, don’t have the right to build temples. And that

Middle East, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, certain regions of Africa and Indonesia and see how the “weaker party� that is, non-Muslims have been treated in those regions? Is there freedom of religion? Is there freedom of speech? Can you openly practice your faith? What about civil laws?

All these days I have been trying to dig in the ground realities regarding violation of human rights in Saudi Arabia. Well the thing is there are rules

It states in 6.e Religious freedom to every one and prohibition of any exercise of force in this respect, in response to God’s Sayings in the Glorious Koran: “Let there be no compulsion in religion,” (II, 256) and “Wilt thou then compel mankind against their will to believe!” (X, 99). These sayings show how the use of pressure on man’s religious freedom is denounced.

but what should be of concern to us are the practices. But then I wonder how do I justify my point when the Saudis and most of the Arab states don’t follow the Islamic guidelines. Fine I will try to argue rationally without being prejudiced or biased. I have based this post on the comments here

As far as religious rights are concerned, the Saudi adhere to the ardent Wahabbi school of thought. They are opposed to the sufi sect in Islam and their practices, the Shias and every other sect which don’t fall under Ahle-sunnah-wal-jamaat. People take out processions during Muharram in India but its strictly banned there and similar celebrations. They have been strict with other religions as well, they have allowed churches and synagogues but not temples or gurudwaras. The reason being idol worship. Then they have strict rules regarding women, both muslim and non-muslim, covering themselves. But I think these strict rules are only in SA or perhaps Yemen, other Arab states are more liberal in this regard especially Dubai and Oman.

One more question amazes me. There have no reports of riots in Gulf, even when the Babri Masjid was demolished or during the Gujrat massacre. Hindus would have been ideal prey in the Gulf but nothing of that sort happened. I have never heard about mass atrocities or discriminations against non-muslims. In fact they do differentiate between a white and a non-white. So they have no soft corner for Indian Muslims even. Arabs don’t have the crowd mentality that few organizations in India are known for. A commenter Bob has this to say

And regarding the discussion going on here i have few things to add. Western culture has been far superior to any of the islamic countires or india. I say this because look at the organizations representing hindus in india, vhp and rss. they spilt venom agaisnt the minority, people like our previous home minister led a rath yatra that led to riots, chief minister of a state is fanatically against minorities and just see the kind of acts committed during riots my hindu zealots. (they have raped women, burned houses with people in it even an ex-mp was not spared, burned cars with family members in it, tear open the womb of a pregnant woman and what not). so if india were to be a hindu nation then i am damn sure these fanatics would have ruined this country in no time. minorities would have been subjected to atrocities beyond imagination.

I say all these based on the fact that vhp and rss are representors of hindus and majority of hindus patronize these organizations, which is certainly not the case with christens or even muslims.

The very basic structure of India and Muslim countries differ. India was formed on the basis of being secular so any comparison is unjustified. Noemaun has something interesting to add-

SA is a muslim country. It is islamic. Thus the religious rights of those who come there for work will be curtailed. Jews living in southern parts of saudi for centuries are given special rights because they are citizens. India is not a hindu country. It belongs to muslims as much as it belongs to hindus. Thus no sane hindu would claim that India should also have rules like them. But then fanatic hindus dont even recognise the fact that we muslims are a part of India. So I as a Indian muslim, see no need why hindus should be given any more freedom in SA to have temples.

I dont care to prove my allegiance to India. We as muslims in India do not need the mercy of a group of fanatic hindus to exist. We can not be forced by threatening us of gujarat like incidents. Death comes from Allah. And we know how to protect ourself. So if all indian muslims decide not to sing vande mataram, then indians will have to accept it. period. The fact that we muslims are ourselves debating whether to sing it, actually gives room for discussion.

First of all I do not even accept that non-muslims are being treated badly in the muslim countries. They do not deserve any special rights as they do not belong to the country. Who is asking hindus to go all the way to SA if it does not have temples. Not as bad as muslims are themselves being treated in their land in various parts of the world. Just as you would not accept that there is discrimination in India, I do not take your statement for granted. Some form of discrimination will always be there. But you exaggerate things to an extent beyond which your statement has no value.

When they talk about Gandhiji’s statement

Mahatma Gandhi made about human nature - that if you want to find out the true nature of a person, find out how he treats a weaker person

to that I ask which religion treats poor and downtrodden better that Islam? Does any other religion in the world has the concept of Zakaat? The way Arabs have supported the Palestinians is praiseworthy. Tons of food goes to Africa after Haj evey year.

I wouldn’t written a word if the post heading would have read like “are muslims peaceful?”. It’s because I acknowledge the fact the Muslims around the world have much to amend. Until and unless they try to change themselves and thus affect opinions, Islam will continue to come under fire.

I thank commenters Schacht,Noemaun,Bob,Polite Indian,Atlantean and The Illusionist for taking part in the discussions. Well just to end this quote

Opinions are like assholes — everybody has one

BTW when i say frivolous opinions i mean those in the posts that sparked this controversy not those valuable comments on my blog!! Sorry for the confusion

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Atlantean 09.26.06 at 3:31 am

Pleasure :)

2

Polite Indian 09.27.06 at 7:01 am

Shaarique,

Thanks for acknowledging our participation in the discussion.

But are you serious that the comments were frivolous? You just undermined everyone’s effort and their taking time to come to your blog and post their views. I can understand that you might not like some of the comments made by some but doesn’t mean that you should call them frivolous.

BTW, I am not upset by this post of yours and would keep visiting your blog regularly but hope that my comments wouldn’t be marked frivolous in the future.

3

Sharique 09.27.06 at 7:39 am

Polite indian,
i didn’t mean that discussion had frivolous comments..i meant those posts i have replied to were frivolous!!! sorry for the confusion

4

Polite Indian 09.27.06 at 8:07 am

Shaarique,

Thanks for clearing that up. :)

5

How Do We Know 09.27.06 at 11:43 am

Sharique,

I dont quite agree with a lot of these things that you have said here.

6

Sharique 09.27.06 at 4:47 pm

How do we know,
Well disagreement is a sign of progressive society :D so you see we are all part of one growing intellectual society. I appreciate that you took the trouble to read through but then you didn’t point at specific points of your disagreements.

BTW if you haven’t noticed by now (even in your blog) your links don’t work because you put that extra http in them (its working above because i edited that).

7

Bob 09.28.06 at 5:10 am

Thanks for featuring my comment. I had a nice time with you all, especially atlantean ;)

8

HP 09.29.06 at 2:17 am

Noemaun’s comment is interesting…
They do not deserve any special rights as they do not belong to the country. Who is asking hindus to go all the way to SA if it does not have temples. Not as bad as muslims are themselves being treated in their land in various parts of the world.

Nice to know that…Really nice..

Cheers,
HP

9

pallavi 09.29.06 at 5:04 am

hi sharique.
your post was nice im really agreed with bob but as far as matter of singing vande matram i would like to say it is dicipline of our country so we should better accept it insted of making so much of useless debuts.. you said their is discrimination in india.. is it really.. how many times have you faced problems in your education or org or any where being a muslim…hey dear you said india is not only a hindu country muslims also have a fair part in it.. yes ofcourse muslims are also a part of it then why they are not behaving as a part of this country.. why they are not accepting vande matram.. like indians have accepted not to build temples in SA…. Noemaun’s comment is interesting…
They do not deserve any special rights as they do not belong to the country. Who is asking hindus to go all the way to SA if it does not have temples.THIS CAN BE APPLIED TO MUSLIMS ALSO… hey sharique i really respect islam and i dont mean any thing i have said above… becouse i dont bother all these things .i just wanted to say there are lots and lots of reasons one can give in support of his/her statements. we are educated people and atlest we should not participate in such kind of disscusions … every one know very well that respscting others emotion is only soltuion of these things. its not a big deal whter you are allowed to build temple or not or vandematram is compulsory.. becouse all religions says “god is in your heart”.i think all these things are superficial..its our responsibilty to make this place better.. but if we will indulge our self in such kind of activities then we are not different from our politicians… so now stp discussing such things

10

Sharique 09.29.06 at 6:35 am

HP,
Thanks for dropping by

Pallavi,
I agree that i have never faced any discrimination in my career so far but the same isn’t true for all muslims. Ok thats not the point, the point is vande mataram is something which is not essential to prove our loyalty to India. Muslims would take strong exception to anything which goes against their faith. Please understand this, if India tomorrow starts forcing things which are against Islam then muslims would never tolerate that, its because faith is something very very important to muslims. Please read my vande mataram post on it. I still don’t understand one thing, how singing and not singing proves a person’s loyalty to India? its just a song!!

I appreciate your concern for peace to prevail and we as educated citizens should avoid such controversies. Its like playing into the hands of politicians. But then I am for complete freedom in religion. Let religion be a matter of choice and a country cannot force things on an individual…freedom of expression you see. Noemaun made that comment in response to the posts i have mentioned in the first para of this post. They were really poisonous and and were criticizing Islam. I would never have raised such questions but then they forced me to do so. I do understand that there are people who would like to create trouble and we should be patient but then a response was necessary.

11

hello_poly 09.30.06 at 12:11 pm

critising a religion will never be appriciated by me.. but really making discrimination is done by indians not india.. lets see what is discrimination.. explaing one “that is you” and “this is me” and i think we are doing the same thing right now.. by the way your space have a good content nice things to read. really liked it

12

pallavi 09.30.06 at 12:20 pm

hi sharique
one more thing, after reading your ans and post again i was thinking one more thing what i ill do if there is a muslim goverment and they will make compulsary to chant duas in school or read namaz in my navratri. would i do that.. and then my ans is no completly no..i ill not do that… im always agreed with your some points(but not all)

13

Sharique 09.30.06 at 10:27 pm

Pallavi,
Indians make up India. Anyway i agree these arguments and counter argument doesn’t help and they just widen the already existing gap.
BTW a Muslim government can never enforce this law that non-muslims will also have to pray namaz. I wonder why this prejudice? See the gulf countries, there are many non-muslims working there..are they forced to pray behind muslims? Its because religious freedom is something which Islam recognizes and the law, you have talked about, will be seriously irrational.
You know sometimes i wonder why people are so prejudiced against other religions. Same case with muslims even..they will make imaginary scenarios and curse hindus. We need a better interaction with people from other communities and clear our minds of such existing notions.

14

khansa 10.02.06 at 3:43 am

Pallavi,
“They do not deserve any special rights as they do not belong to the country. Who is asking hindus to go all the way to SA if it does not have temples.THIS CAN BE APPLIED TO MUSLIMS ALSO…”
Muslims in India are not people who came and settled in India from middle east. Most of the Indian muslims are descendants of Indians (or to make it more clear, read Hindus), who converted to Islam and are as much Indian as other Indians. The only difference being in religion. India is our homeland, and we are citizens of India as much as anyone else, not aliens.

15

pallavi 10.03.06 at 1:40 am

yes sharique,
that is waht exactly i wanted to say…. discusion will creat gap only

16

pallavi 10.03.06 at 1:53 am

hi khansa,
dont want to say any thing just few words muslims are also part of india and accept them like that… once again these discusion is friut less becaouse we have been living with them and we have to live with them in future also.. and this applied to both hindu and muslims

17

HP 10.03.06 at 11:23 pm

@khansa,

So you wouldn’t mind if any Muslims coming from Bangladesh or anywhere else to setlle are treated as second class citizens…

Well, as Pallavi said this discussion is futile and sometimes, so is our existence..

Cheers,
HP

18

antariksh 11.15.06 at 1:58 pm

dear shaarique,

singing vande mataram is not abt proving ur loyality to India. its abt being open-minded. Vande Mataram isnt a Hindu song although it has some flavour of hinduism in it. its a song abt saluting ur Motherland. the basic argument for not singing Vande Mataram is tht it includes reference to Hindu gods. i wonder why my muslim brothers cant be tht open minded to sing a song tht has a reference to a god of a majority faith. thts called ’sahishnuta’ in hindi. i respect ur faith n u respect mine.

hope i m conveying my point.

19

Sharique 11.15.06 at 9:02 pm

Dear antariksh,
Your point is perfectly taken but then as a muslim there are certain restrictions on things i can do. Being open minded doesn’t mean i transgress the boundaries of Islam. Singing or not doesn’t affect our patriotism but it does affects our religion.
[quote post="251"]i respect ur faith n u respect mine. [/quote]
Yes i never disrespected your faith by not singing it.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>